__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Mr Malcolm James Baker,
42 Spencer Avenue,
Maketu 3189
Minister of Justice,
Parliament Buildings,
Wellington.
Copy Opposition Justice Spokesperson
My web site http://whitechapel.yolasite.com/ministerjustice240709
24th July 2009
Dear sir,
Thank you for your letter in reply to mine.
I note that you point out that while I did take a person to court to recover a debt, and the court found that it could not hear the case because it did not "have jurisdiction", in fact the property manager was aware of my having done so and did not object.
You say that the person named as bringing the action must be the property manager, in this case New Zealand Guardian Trust, and that is part of the legislation.
You should also be aware that there is no reason why I have a court appointed property manager, other than the fact that Guardian Trust applied for it. There are no mental health or criminal matters, and the court made that clear in Judge Somerville's ruling, which is on my web site. You should also know Guardian Trust has refused to allow me to marry the woman I love, because she lives in Serbia, and I have to pay for her tickets, and have the money but Guardian Trust refuses to let me have it. If she were my wife, the court order applying to me would not apply to her and she could bring legal action in her own name.
I have asked the Minister of Police to investigate a rape complaint against Judge Somerville, and have accused my lawyer Mr Patterson of committing the act, but he denies it, and I also think you should investigate the facts to your own satisfaction to see whether in fact the Judge was threatened with death (that she would be shot) if she did not comply.
How can a company (Telecom) sell something it does not own?
Telecom is no longer just a telephone company. It also sells internet service.
The fact are internet connections require "browsers". Browsers are written and for JavaScript. JavaScript is owned solely by a company called Sun. Even though Mozilla distributes the browser, and fixes bugs, it does not own the software. Microsoft also distributes a browser, even though there is a court order saying they must not do so. I wrote the manual which documents the operating system drivers, and I also wrote the manual which was the basis for the original "modem" and wrote the software which enabled the manual to be "archived" using software with a .arc file extension. It was I who wrote achieved instead of archived, twice, a spelling error which appears in both versions of the manual, the book version and the archived (or zip file or compressed file) version. I also wrote the timing system software, and the mouse software, but not only did I write it and still own copyright, I also have a document which confers ownership of Sun, which is owned by Dragon, another software company which distributes language tutorials and voice recognition software.
My point is, even though Telecom is a company I would have difficulty proving ownership of, I do have clear title to the browser and to JavaScript, and as such I should have some of the income from those like Telecom who own the name JetStream, which is the official name for "broadband". What I must do to make this legal, and enforceable, is get a court declaration or ruling on the matter, but as you point out this is not possible without Guardian Trust's consent, and they have decided not to give it. I will ask Craig Roebuck again on this matter, but he has already spoken on the matter of my intention to meet Sladja and her family. Why should I wait three years on somebodies whim just because they have the "power" over me?
If you still don't understand what I want, first investigate the rape, let me investigate a rape complaint Sladja may have, and then think about paying me for the browser software, which costs $2,009 per copy, about the same as the windows software and computer costs, which are essential to its use, and think about how justice would be served in this country by letting me have some of the money the government owes me for my part of its internet access and use.
It is easy to say, that is something Telecom and Microsoft owe me, and I should talk to them, but you know I can't take legal action, and they are pretending not to know. If the Minister of Justice doesn't care that he is using stolen software, even though technically it isn't stolen until the court says so, I am sure that I can convince the court, and next year, when the property management order expires, I will put it to the court. In the mean time there is nothing preventing the government from showing "good will" and either finding out where we disagree on my ownership claim, or coming to some arrangement about payment before the court says that the existing use is illegal.
Yours sincerely,
Malcolm Baker.